<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 679 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281882</link>
    <description>The court granted leave to amend pleadings and allowed the plaintiffs to apply for the sale of properties under the Court Receiver&#039;s supervision. Unsecured creditors were permitted to pursue their claims, with priority given to secured creditors. Workers entitled to paripasu charge under Section 529-A of the Companies Act were to have their claims discharged. Other employees not covered by Section 529-A were treated like unsecured creditors. All parties agreed to the proposed arrangements. The suit was decreed as per the Minutes of Order, and the Notice of Motion was disposed of without specific cost orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 18:40:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 679 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281882</link>
      <description>The court granted leave to amend pleadings and allowed the plaintiffs to apply for the sale of properties under the Court Receiver&#039;s supervision. Unsecured creditors were permitted to pursue their claims, with priority given to secured creditors. Workers entitled to paripasu charge under Section 529-A of the Companies Act were to have their claims discharged. Other employees not covered by Section 529-A were treated like unsecured creditors. All parties agreed to the proposed arrangements. The suit was decreed as per the Minutes of Order, and the Notice of Motion was disposed of without specific cost orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>