<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1941 (3) TMI 24 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281878</link>
    <description>Successor company carry-forward of predecessor&#039;s unabsorbed depreciation was denied on the facts and circumstances of the reference, which followed the view already taken in a connected matter involving the same question. The court held that the Income-tax Officer was correct in law in refusing to carry forward the unabsorbed depreciation into the company&#039;s relevant assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 1941 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:52:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1941 (3) TMI 24 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281878</link>
      <description>Successor company carry-forward of predecessor&#039;s unabsorbed depreciation was denied on the facts and circumstances of the reference, which followed the view already taken in a connected matter involving the same question. The court held that the Income-tax Officer was correct in law in refusing to carry forward the unabsorbed depreciation into the company&#039;s relevant assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 1941 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>