https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281875 A final surplus-area order under the land ceiling law remains effective even if the Government has not yet utilised the surplus land for resettlement of tenants, because the statute does not impose a time limit for such utilisation and gives the landowner no right to reclaim the land for delay. State reorganisation also does not permit a fresh claim to the permissible area in each successor State where the pre-reorganisation order had already become final; the reorganisation and adaptation provisions preserved existing rights, liabilities, notifications, and orders. The pre-existing surplus determination therefore continued to bind the landowner. en-us Thu, 26 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:52:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281875 A final surplus-area order under the land ceiling law remains effective even if the Government has not yet utilised the surplus land for resettlement of tenants, because the statute does not impose a time limit for such utilisation and gives the landowner no right to reclaim the land for delay. State reorganisation also does not permit a fresh claim to the permissible area in each successor State where the pre-reorganisation order had already become final; the reorganisation and adaptation provisions preserved existing rights, liabilities, notifications, and orders. The pre-existing surplus determination therefore continued to bind the landowner. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281875