<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 399 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281874</link>
    <description>Pre-existing service rules continued in the Union Territory of Chandigarh after reorganisation unless expressly or by necessary implication modified or repealed. The Supreme Court noted that Section 88 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act preserved the earlier law, and that the 1966 notifications did not extend the Central Civil Services regime to probation, confirmation, seniority and promotion for Class II, III and IV employees under the Administrator&#039;s control. As the claimed benefit of earlier qualifying military service arose under the 1965 Rules and was not displaced by the later notifications, those rules remained applicable, with accrued rights also saved by the 1982 Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 399 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281874</link>
      <description>Pre-existing service rules continued in the Union Territory of Chandigarh after reorganisation unless expressly or by necessary implication modified or repealed. The Supreme Court noted that Section 88 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act preserved the earlier law, and that the 1966 notifications did not extend the Central Civil Services regime to probation, confirmation, seniority and promotion for Class II, III and IV employees under the Administrator&#039;s control. As the claimed benefit of earlier qualifying military service arose under the 1965 Rules and was not displaced by the later notifications, those rules remained applicable, with accrued rights also saved by the 1982 Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>