https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281873 The discussion explains that officiating or temporary engineers could not claim protection under the repealed 1942 service rules where appointment, probation and cadre status did not establish a statutory right to confirmation, so reversion was treated as administrative rather than punitive and Article 311(2) was not attracted. It also states that, on territorial reorganisation, administrative orders of the former State continued to operate in successor States until lawfully modified or repudiated, and an order was communicated once it left the issuing authority's control. On that reasoning, the reversion orders were effective before the appointed day and were treated as valid. en-us Mon, 06 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:42:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281873 The discussion explains that officiating or temporary engineers could not claim protection under the repealed 1942 service rules where appointment, probation and cadre status did not establish a statutory right to confirmation, so reversion was treated as administrative rather than punitive and Article 311(2) was not attracted. It also states that, on territorial reorganisation, administrative orders of the former State continued to operate in successor States until lawfully modified or repudiated, and an order was communicated once it left the issuing authority's control. On that reasoning, the reversion orders were effective before the appointed day and were treated as valid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281873