https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382775 The court upheld the legality of the order of prohibition of goods, finding that the Proper Officer had valid reasons to believe the applicant had contravened GST Act provisions. It determined that the order complied with principles of natural justice and was not premature, as confiscation proceedings were initiated. The court also validated the seizure order, emphasizing strict compliance with statutory provisions. Procedural requirements under Section 67 of the GST Act were deemed met. The court allowed the applicant to seek release of seized goods under specified conditions, ultimately disposing of the writ application accordingly. en-us Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Mar 2025 14:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382775 The court upheld the legality of the order of prohibition of goods, finding that the Proper Officer had valid reasons to believe the applicant had contravened GST Act provisions. It determined that the order complied with principles of natural justice and was not premature, as confiscation proceedings were initiated. The court also validated the seizure order, emphasizing strict compliance with statutory provisions. Procedural requirements under Section 67 of the GST Act were deemed met. The court allowed the applicant to seek release of seized goods under specified conditions, ultimately disposing of the writ application accordingly. Case-Laws GST Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382775