https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382773 Imported extra clear float glass was treated as a distinct product from the clear and tinted float glass covered by Notification No. 4/2009-Cus because the evidence showed differences in composition, iron content, light transmission, appearance, commercial description, and price. The Tribunal also noted that extra clear glass was not shown to be manufactured in India, so no injury could be attributed to a non-existent like domestic product. On that basis, the imports were held outside the scope of the anti-dumping notification and not liable to anti-dumping duty, and the assessments were directed to be made without such duty. en-us Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Feb 2020 12:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382773 Imported extra clear float glass was treated as a distinct product from the clear and tinted float glass covered by Notification No. 4/2009-Cus because the evidence showed differences in composition, iron content, light transmission, appearance, commercial description, and price. The Tribunal also noted that extra clear glass was not shown to be manufactured in India, so no injury could be attributed to a non-existent like domestic product. On that basis, the imports were held outside the scope of the anti-dumping notification and not liable to anti-dumping duty, and the assessments were directed to be made without such duty. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382773