<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 457 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382761</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the confirmation of Central Excise duty demand on samples withdrawn for testing within the pharmaceutical company&#039;s factory premises. The decision emphasized that samples consumed during testing are not marketable, aligning with precedents highlighting the importance of testing for marketability in pharmaceutical products. The Tribunal distinguished the duty liability based on the nature of products and supported the appellant&#039;s entitlement to specific notifications for samples used in manufacturing. The judgment underscores the necessity of accurate record-keeping and recognizes the unique regulatory requirements for pharmaceutical samples in determining excise duty liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:32:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 457 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382761</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the confirmation of Central Excise duty demand on samples withdrawn for testing within the pharmaceutical company&#039;s factory premises. The decision emphasized that samples consumed during testing are not marketable, aligning with precedents highlighting the importance of testing for marketability in pharmaceutical products. The Tribunal distinguished the duty liability based on the nature of products and supported the appellant&#039;s entitlement to specific notifications for samples used in manufacturing. The judgment underscores the necessity of accurate record-keeping and recognizes the unique regulatory requirements for pharmaceutical samples in determining excise duty liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>