https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382753 A complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act against company directors was found sufficient where it specifically averred that they were in charge of and responsible for the company's day-to-day affairs and management at the time of the offence. The Court applied the settled principle that such a basic averment is enough to sustain issuance of process against directors, and that quashing at the threshold is unwarranted absent unimpeachable material showing they had no concern with the cheque transaction. It also reiterated that jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC does not permit a mini trial. The challenge to process therefore failed. en-us Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:25:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382753 A complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act against company directors was found sufficient where it specifically averred that they were in charge of and responsible for the company's day-to-day affairs and management at the time of the offence. The Court applied the settled principle that such a basic averment is enough to sustain issuance of process against directors, and that quashing at the threshold is unwarranted absent unimpeachable material showing they had no concern with the cheque transaction. It also reiterated that jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC does not permit a mini trial. The challenge to process therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382753