<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 445 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382749</link>
    <description>Service tax paid on commission to overseas sales agents was treated as eligible input service credit because the agents were engaged not only in selling goods but also in actively promoting sales and maintaining a sales force. The activity was therefore characterised as sales promotion rather than a bare sales transaction. The contrary departmental reliance on a Gujarat High Court ruling was distinguished on facts, and the Board circular was read as supporting credit where commission is linked to actual sales and includes a promotional element. The later explanation to the input service definition was treated as clarificatory, so credit remained admissible even for the period before 03.02.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 06:50:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 445 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382749</link>
      <description>Service tax paid on commission to overseas sales agents was treated as eligible input service credit because the agents were engaged not only in selling goods but also in actively promoting sales and maintaining a sales force. The activity was therefore characterised as sales promotion rather than a bare sales transaction. The contrary departmental reliance on a Gujarat High Court ruling was distinguished on facts, and the Board circular was read as supporting credit where commission is linked to actual sales and includes a promotional element. The later explanation to the input service definition was treated as clarificatory, so credit remained admissible even for the period before 03.02.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>