<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 434 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382738</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, reducing it from 300% to 100% of the tax sought to be evaded. The penalty was lowered to Rs. 23,962 from the initial Rs. 1,70,317 due to the undisclosed long term capital gain by the assessee. The decision emphasized the significance of accurate income disclosure and the repercussions of non-disclosure as per the provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 434 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382738</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, reducing it from 300% to 100% of the tax sought to be evaded. The penalty was lowered to Rs. 23,962 from the initial Rs. 1,70,317 due to the undisclosed long term capital gain by the assessee. The decision emphasized the significance of accurate income disclosure and the repercussions of non-disclosure as per the provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>