<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 430 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382734</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that no addition on account of deemed rent of unsold units held as stock in trade could be made. The ITAT found no distinguishing features between the present case and a previous decision involving the assessee&#039;s sister concern, where the issue was decided in favor of the assessee. Therefore, the ITAT set aside the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition and allowed the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 06:48:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 430 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382734</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that no addition on account of deemed rent of unsold units held as stock in trade could be made. The ITAT found no distinguishing features between the present case and a previous decision involving the assessee&#039;s sister concern, where the issue was decided in favor of the assessee. Therefore, the ITAT set aside the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition and allowed the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>