<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 429 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382733</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the amount of Rs. 3,55,45,600 accrued and was received by the assessee during the financial year 2010-11. The claim for the benefit under Section 11(1) Explanation-2 was rejected, as the option was not exercised. The Tribunal found no violation of natural justice and held that the subsequent addendum was not valid. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 429 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382733</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the amount of Rs. 3,55,45,600 accrued and was received by the assessee during the financial year 2010-11. The claim for the benefit under Section 11(1) Explanation-2 was rejected, as the option was not exercised. The Tribunal found no violation of natural justice and held that the subsequent addendum was not valid. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>