<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 23 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18868</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the disallowance of expenditures under &quot;Nursery expenses,&quot; &quot;Livestock maintenance,&quot; and &quot;Banana culture operation,&quot; citing reasons such as limited planting area and lack of evidence. The court partially allowed the tax case, remanding the depreciation claim on tractor expenses back to the Assessing Officer for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:12:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 23 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18868</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the disallowance of expenditures under &quot;Nursery expenses,&quot; &quot;Livestock maintenance,&quot; and &quot;Banana culture operation,&quot; citing reasons such as limited planting area and lack of evidence. The court partially allowed the tax case, remanding the depreciation claim on tractor expenses back to the Assessing Officer for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>