<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 422 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382726</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 17,84,920/- as peak credit to the assessee&#039;s income, disallowed the claim of Rs. 23,67,580/- loss from share broking due to late filing, and rejected the credibility of the claim regarding Rs. 16,00,000/- received from the assessee&#039;s wife. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, with the order pronounced on April 23, 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 422 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382726</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 17,84,920/- as peak credit to the assessee&#039;s income, disallowed the claim of Rs. 23,67,580/- loss from share broking due to late filing, and rejected the credibility of the claim regarding Rs. 16,00,000/- received from the assessee&#039;s wife. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, with the order pronounced on April 23, 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>