<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1693 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281865</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to grant relief to the assessee by allowing the fresh claim of deduction. Relying on judicial precedents, including the Supreme Court decision in Goetze India Ltd vs. CIT, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of affording the assessee a fair opportunity to present their case. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the relief granted to the assessee was upheld, highlighting the significance of following legal precedents in rendering the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 06:37:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1693 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281865</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to grant relief to the assessee by allowing the fresh claim of deduction. Relying on judicial precedents, including the Supreme Court decision in Goetze India Ltd vs. CIT, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of affording the assessee a fair opportunity to present their case. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the relief granted to the assessee was upheld, highlighting the significance of following legal precedents in rendering the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>