<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2005 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281859</link>
    <description>The tribunal declined to condone the delay and dismissed both the applications seeking condonation of delay and the appeals due to unsatisfactory reasons provided for the delay in filing the appeals, the applicant&#039;s awareness of related legal proceedings, and the lack of concrete evidence to support his claims of being unaware of the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 06:37:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2005 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281859</link>
      <description>The tribunal declined to condone the delay and dismissed both the applications seeking condonation of delay and the appeals due to unsatisfactory reasons provided for the delay in filing the appeals, the applicant&#039;s awareness of related legal proceedings, and the lack of concrete evidence to support his claims of being unaware of the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>