https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281870 The Adjudicating Authority rejected the application to enhance the claim as the Resolution Plan had been approved under Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Appellate Tribunal upheld this decision, stating that the application for enhancement was not maintainable after plan approval. The Tribunal clarified the Resolution Professional's role in determining claims for the Committee of Creditors and dismissed the appeal due to the delay in raising the issue, emphasizing seeking relief from the appropriate forum. en-us Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jul 2019 06:37:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281870 The Adjudicating Authority rejected the application to enhance the claim as the Resolution Plan had been approved under Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Appellate Tribunal upheld this decision, stating that the application for enhancement was not maintainable after plan approval. The Tribunal clarified the Resolution Professional's role in determining claims for the Committee of Creditors and dismissed the appeal due to the delay in raising the issue, emphasizing seeking relief from the appropriate forum. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281870