<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 703 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281850</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the additions made by the Assessing Officer regarding the foreign gifts. The Tribunal found that the gifts were not genuine, the donors&#039; capacity was not proven, and the stated occasion for the gifts was not substantiated. As a result, the addition of Rs. 2,36,838 to the assessee&#039;s income was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 17:30:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 703 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281850</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the additions made by the Assessing Officer regarding the foreign gifts. The Tribunal found that the gifts were not genuine, the donors&#039; capacity was not proven, and the stated occasion for the gifts was not substantiated. As a result, the addition of Rs. 2,36,838 to the assessee&#039;s income was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>