<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 985 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281848</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeals for assessment years 2002-03 to 2005-06 related to unexplained investments and construction costs. However, the appeal for 2003-04 was partly allowed concerning interest under section 234D, holding the assessee liable from the date of the amended provision as per High Court ruling. The Tribunal upheld CIT(Appeals) decision on construction cost deductions but reversed it on the issue of interest under section 234D.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:40:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 985 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281848</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeals for assessment years 2002-03 to 2005-06 related to unexplained investments and construction costs. However, the appeal for 2003-04 was partly allowed concerning interest under section 234D, holding the assessee liable from the date of the amended provision as per High Court ruling. The Tribunal upheld CIT(Appeals) decision on construction cost deductions but reversed it on the issue of interest under section 234D.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>