<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 395 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382699</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, setting aside the impugned order and confirming their entitlement to CENVAT credit on inputs for manufacturing GGBS and exporting it. The decision aligned with established case law and previous decisions, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s right to both avail and refund CENVAT credit, including on GBFS used in the production process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 07:13:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 395 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382699</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, setting aside the impugned order and confirming their entitlement to CENVAT credit on inputs for manufacturing GGBS and exporting it. The decision aligned with established case law and previous decisions, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s right to both avail and refund CENVAT credit, including on GBFS used in the production process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>