<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Quashes Section 69A Addition for Unexplained Money; CIT(A) Error in Handling Cheque&#039;s Long Holding Period.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47799</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 69A - unexplained money - sum received on sale of land co-owned - sale through conveyance deed - year of assessment - it was factually incorrect on the part of the CIT(A) to conclude that the assessee did not offer any reason for holding the cheque and not deposited the same for a long period of time and such conclusion deserves to be quashed. No merit for the addition u/s.69A</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 06:21:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 06:21:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Quashes Section 69A Addition for Unexplained Money; CIT(A) Error in Handling Cheque&#039;s Long Holding Period.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47799</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 69A - unexplained money - sum received on sale of land co-owned - sale through conveyance deed - year of assessment - it was factually incorrect on the part of the CIT(A) to conclude that the assessee did not offer any reason for holding the cheque and not deposited the same for a long period of time and such conclusion deserves to be quashed. No merit for the addition u/s.69A</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 06:21:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>