<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 45 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18855</link>
    <description>Criminal proceedings for offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Income-tax Act were sought to be quashed, but the allegations concerned the manner of commission and therefore depended on evidence. The HC held that no exceptional ground for interference was shown at the quashing stage and declined to interfere. The petitioner was left free to raise all available contentions before the trial court at the appropriate stage, and the proceedings were not quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:35:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 45 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18855</link>
      <description>Criminal proceedings for offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Income-tax Act were sought to be quashed, but the allegations concerned the manner of commission and therefore depended on evidence. The HC held that no exceptional ground for interference was shown at the quashing stage and declined to interfere. The petitioner was left free to raise all available contentions before the trial court at the appropriate stage, and the proceedings were not quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>