<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 732 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281828</link>
    <description>O.J. Appeal No. 70 of 2004 was disposed of by applying the judgment and order passed in O.J. Appeal No. 69 of 2004, with no separate substantive determination recorded in this order. As a consequence, O.J. Civil Application No. 132 of 2004 was also disposed of and the rule was discharged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 16:44:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 732 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281828</link>
      <description>O.J. Appeal No. 70 of 2004 was disposed of by applying the judgment and order passed in O.J. Appeal No. 69 of 2004, with no separate substantive determination recorded in this order. As a consequence, O.J. Civil Application No. 132 of 2004 was also disposed of and the rule was discharged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>