<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 44 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18852</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act for assessment years 1972-73 and 1974-75. The Court ruled in favor of the Department, finding that the relief claimed by the assessee was not entitled following a subsequent Supreme Court decision that overruled the earlier High Court decision. The Commissioner&#039;s order was deemed valid in terms of jurisdiction and merit, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:29:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 44 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18852</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act for assessment years 1972-73 and 1974-75. The Court ruled in favor of the Department, finding that the relief claimed by the assessee was not entitled following a subsequent Supreme Court decision that overruled the earlier High Court decision. The Commissioner&#039;s order was deemed valid in terms of jurisdiction and merit, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>