https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281827 Failure to supply or properly place before the detaining authority vital documents relied on or considered for preventive detention, including the representation, show cause notice, panchnama material and denied entry list, breached the detenu's right to make an effective representation under Article 22(5). Documents that were said to have influenced the subjective satisfaction but were neither reflected in the grounds nor furnished to the detenu could not be treated as immaterial. The detention order was therefore vitiated and quashed. en-us Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jul 2019 15:53:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281827 Failure to supply or properly place before the detaining authority vital documents relied on or considered for preventive detention, including the representation, show cause notice, panchnama material and denied entry list, breached the detenu's right to make an effective representation under Article 22(5). Documents that were said to have influenced the subjective satisfaction but were neither reflected in the grounds nor furnished to the detenu could not be treated as immaterial. The detention order was therefore vitiated and quashed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281827