<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 343 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281826</link>
    <description>The Division Bench dismissed the writ petition challenging the quota system for promotion in the Punjab State Electricity Board due to delay, non-joinder of necessary parties, and the inequitable nature of the relief sought. The Court emphasized timely filing, proper impleading of affected parties, and equitable considerations in granting relief, setting aside the single Judge&#039;s decision and dismissing related petitions and appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 15:30:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 343 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281826</link>
      <description>The Division Bench dismissed the writ petition challenging the quota system for promotion in the Punjab State Electricity Board due to delay, non-joinder of necessary parties, and the inequitable nature of the relief sought. The Court emphasized timely filing, proper impleading of affected parties, and equitable considerations in granting relief, setting aside the single Judge&#039;s decision and dismissing related petitions and appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>