<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 371 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382675</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision on treating software expenses as revenue expenditure, upheld the use of Rule 8D for computing expenditure under Section 14A, and rejected the allowance of additional depreciation in a different assessment year. The Court also found the Tribunal&#039;s decision consistent with binding precedents, dismissing the tax case appeals without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 07:53:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 371 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382675</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision on treating software expenses as revenue expenditure, upheld the use of Rule 8D for computing expenditure under Section 14A, and rejected the allowance of additional depreciation in a different assessment year. The Court also found the Tribunal&#039;s decision consistent with binding precedents, dismissing the tax case appeals without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>