<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 357 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382661</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 4,45,000 as undisclosed income related to cash advances. The Tribunal considered the advances as genuine business transactions based on legal precedents. The disallowance of interest on housing loan and deduction under section 80C were not pursued during the Tribunal hearing and were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2019 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 357 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382661</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 4,45,000 as undisclosed income related to cash advances. The Tribunal considered the advances as genuine business transactions based on legal precedents. The disallowance of interest on housing loan and deduction under section 80C were not pursued during the Tribunal hearing and were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>