<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 351 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382655</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, after which the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition. As a result, any pending interlocutory applications were disposed of with the dismissal. The text records only this procedural outcome and does not set out any substantive legal principle on the underlying income tax dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 06:46:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 351 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382655</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, after which the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition. As a result, any pending interlocutory applications were disposed of with the dismissal. The text records only this procedural outcome and does not set out any substantive legal principle on the underlying income tax dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>