https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382638 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner(Appeals)'s order dismissing the appeal due to non-payment of mandatory pre-deposit. The appellant's argument that prior payments should be considered towards the pre-deposit was accepted, as the amount already deposited covered the required 7.5% pre-deposit. The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded for further adjudication on the merits of the Order-in-Original. The decision was made on 04.07.2019. en-us Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jul 2019 06:40:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382638 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner(Appeals)'s order dismissing the appeal due to non-payment of mandatory pre-deposit. The appellant's argument that prior payments should be considered towards the pre-deposit was accepted, as the amount already deposited covered the required 7.5% pre-deposit. The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded for further adjudication on the merits of the Order-in-Original. The decision was made on 04.07.2019. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382638