https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382635 The appeal was allowed in a case involving denial of CENVAT credit under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The appellant, an exporter of services, successfully argued for the allowance of CENVAT credit for services exported, except for invoices not bearing the service tax registration number of the service providers. The Tribunal granted the appellant a refund for invoices where the service tax registration number was mentioned, invoices not bearing the appellant's name as the service recipient due to a takeover situation, and invoices issued on unregistered addresses of the appellant's offices across the country. The case was partly allowed and remanded for computation by the original authority. en-us Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jul 2019 11:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382635 The appeal was allowed in a case involving denial of CENVAT credit under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The appellant, an exporter of services, successfully argued for the allowance of CENVAT credit for services exported, except for invoices not bearing the service tax registration number of the service providers. The Tribunal granted the appellant a refund for invoices where the service tax registration number was mentioned, invoices not bearing the appellant's name as the service recipient due to a takeover situation, and invoices issued on unregistered addresses of the appellant's offices across the country. The case was partly allowed and remanded for computation by the original authority. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382635