<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 324 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382628</link>
    <description>Statements of third parties relied upon in a clandestine removal case must be proved in accordance with section 9D of the Central Excise Act, including compliance with the requirement of examination and an opportunity for cross-examination. Where witnesses are not produced and no statutory procedure is followed, such statements lose evidentiary reliability. A charge of clandestine manufacture and clearance also requires clear, positive and clinching corroboration of raw material procurement, manufacture, buyers, transport and receipt of sale proceeds; untested third-party records and isolated shortages are insufficient. The commentary concludes that, without legally proved statements and independent corroborative evidence, duty demands and penalties cannot be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 06:40:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 324 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382628</link>
      <description>Statements of third parties relied upon in a clandestine removal case must be proved in accordance with section 9D of the Central Excise Act, including compliance with the requirement of examination and an opportunity for cross-examination. Where witnesses are not produced and no statutory procedure is followed, such statements lose evidentiary reliability. A charge of clandestine manufacture and clearance also requires clear, positive and clinching corroboration of raw material procurement, manufacture, buyers, transport and receipt of sale proceeds; untested third-party records and isolated shortages are insufficient. The commentary concludes that, without legally proved statements and independent corroborative evidence, duty demands and penalties cannot be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>