<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Quashes Property Attachment Order; Leased Property Not Owned by Dealer u/s 45.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47781</link>
    <description>Attachment of property of related company - some common director - Default/dues on the part of another Company (dealer) - The language of the statute is very clear u/s 45 which provides that AO by order in writing attach provisionally any property belonging to the dealer - property given on lease to dealers does not mean he is of the owner - order attaching the property is quashed</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 06:39:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 06:39:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Quashes Property Attachment Order; Leased Property Not Owned by Dealer u/s 45.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47781</link>
      <description>Attachment of property of related company - some common director - Default/dues on the part of another Company (dealer) - The language of the statute is very clear u/s 45 which provides that AO by order in writing attach provisionally any property belonging to the dealer - property given on lease to dealers does not mean he is of the owner - order attaching the property is quashed</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 06:39:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>