<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1422 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281806</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the petition primarily due to the lack of territorial jurisdiction, without addressing the substantive claims of discrimination under Article 14. The court emphasized the need for a clear nexus between the cause of action and its jurisdiction, citing legal precedents to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2019 09:54:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1422 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281806</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the petition primarily due to the lack of territorial jurisdiction, without addressing the substantive claims of discrimination under Article 14. The court emphasized the need for a clear nexus between the cause of action and its jurisdiction, citing legal precedents to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>