<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1421 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281805</link>
    <description>The High Court examined the validity of a notice for reopening assessment based on an Excise department show cause notice. It considered the ITAT&#039;s decision to quash the reopening and cancel reassessment orders. The Court scheduled tax appeals to review these decisions and directed the case for final hearing. The judgment delved into the legality of the notice, ITAT&#039;s rulings, and the need to address departmental appeals against CIT(A) orders, showcasing the intricate legal aspects at play in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2019 09:54:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1421 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281805</link>
      <description>The High Court examined the validity of a notice for reopening assessment based on an Excise department show cause notice. It considered the ITAT&#039;s decision to quash the reopening and cancel reassessment orders. The Court scheduled tax appeals to review these decisions and directed the case for final hearing. The judgment delved into the legality of the notice, ITAT&#039;s rulings, and the need to address departmental appeals against CIT(A) orders, showcasing the intricate legal aspects at play in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>