<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1590 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281816</link>
    <description>The Kerala HC applied its earlier judgment dated 11 January 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 11335 of 2018 and connected cases to reject the challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 174 of the KSGST Act. It also treated the plea that the demands were time-barred under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act as already covered by that binding ratio, and declined fresh adjudication on limitation. The writ petitions were dismissed on both grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2019 09:54:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1590 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281816</link>
      <description>The Kerala HC applied its earlier judgment dated 11 January 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 11335 of 2018 and connected cases to reject the challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 174 of the KSGST Act. It also treated the plea that the demands were time-barred under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act as already covered by that binding ratio, and declined fresh adjudication on limitation. The writ petitions were dismissed on both grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>