<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1193 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281813</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court stayed the operation of the impugned judgment and order dated 24.07.2014 passed by the High Court of Delhi in W.P.(C) No. 416/2014 and 417/2014. Despite concerns of potential prejudice raised by the respondents, the Court allowed adjudication proceedings to continue but directed that finalization would require the leave of the Supreme Court to prevent any party from facing undue prejudice. The case was listed for further proceedings after six weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2019 09:54:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1193 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281813</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court stayed the operation of the impugned judgment and order dated 24.07.2014 passed by the High Court of Delhi in W.P.(C) No. 416/2014 and 417/2014. Despite concerns of potential prejudice raised by the respondents, the Court allowed adjudication proceedings to continue but directed that finalization would require the leave of the Supreme Court to prevent any party from facing undue prejudice. The case was listed for further proceedings after six weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>