https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281783 Recall of a final criminal judgment is distinguished from review or alteration: review modifies an existing judgment, whereas recall nullifies it and restores the matter for fresh hearing. The bar on review or alteration does not exclude inherent jurisdiction to recall a merits judgment where the accused or counsel was not heard. In appropriate circumstances, denial of hearing may amount to failure of justice, permitting recall to secure the ends of justice, prevent abuse of process, and comply with audi alteram partem, subject to the statutory limits governing inherent powers. en-us Fri, 05 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jul 2019 10:39:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281783 Recall of a final criminal judgment is distinguished from review or alteration: review modifies an existing judgment, whereas recall nullifies it and restores the matter for fresh hearing. The bar on review or alteration does not exclude inherent jurisdiction to recall a merits judgment where the accused or counsel was not heard. In appropriate circumstances, denial of hearing may amount to failure of justice, permitting recall to secure the ends of justice, prevent abuse of process, and comply with audi alteram partem, subject to the statutory limits governing inherent powers. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281783