https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281781 Section 362 CrPC does not require a rigid or overly technical bar against recall where strict application would defeat justice. The Court distinguished recall from review: recall may be used where an affected party was not heard, while review concerns an error apparent on the face of the record. Because the earlier criminal revision order had been passed when the revisionist was absent, the High Court was justified in recalling that order and directing the matter to be listed for fresh hearing. No error was found in the impugned order. en-us Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Aug 2023 16:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281781 Section 362 CrPC does not require a rigid or overly technical bar against recall where strict application would defeat justice. The Court distinguished recall from review: recall may be used where an affected party was not heard, while review concerns an error apparent on the face of the record. Because the earlier criminal revision order had been passed when the revisionist was absent, the High Court was justified in recalling that order and directing the matter to be listed for fresh hearing. No error was found in the impugned order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281781