<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 5 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18831</link>
    <description>Depreciation remained allowable on trucks that were under repair during the relevant years because their temporary repair status did not interrupt continuity of business use. The vehicles had been used in the assessee&#039;s business before and after those years, so they continued to be regarded as used for the purposes of the business notwithstanding the repairs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2025 10:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 5 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18831</link>
      <description>Depreciation remained allowable on trucks that were under repair during the relevant years because their temporary repair status did not interrupt continuity of business use. The vehicles had been used in the assessee&#039;s business before and after those years, so they continued to be regarded as used for the purposes of the business notwithstanding the repairs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>