https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382617 The Authority dismissed the applicant's claim of profiteering as there was no actual GST rate reduction applicable to the specific computer monitor in question. The investigation revealed that the product was already taxed at 18% since July 2017, and no further reduction occurred. Therefore, the allegation of failure to pass on benefits was deemed baseless, and the case was closed. en-us Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382617 The Authority dismissed the applicant's claim of profiteering as there was no actual GST rate reduction applicable to the specific computer monitor in question. The investigation revealed that the product was already taxed at 18% since July 2017, and no further reduction occurred. Therefore, the allegation of failure to pass on benefits was deemed baseless, and the case was closed. Case-Laws GST Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382617