https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382585 The court addressed a challenge to the Service Tax recovery order dated 21st December 2016, issued by the Commissioner, Service Tax, Mumbai. The petitioner cited discriminatory treatment compared to M/s. Bharuch Dahej Railway Co. Ltd., whose similar case was dismissed by the Tribunal on 25th March 2019. The court queried the Revenue's acceptance of the Delhi Commissioner's order and sought clarity on whether the Tribunal's decision would be challenged. The matter was adjourned to 1st August 2019, allowing the Revenue time to confirm its position on the Tribunal's ruling. en-us Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382585 The court addressed a challenge to the Service Tax recovery order dated 21st December 2016, issued by the Commissioner, Service Tax, Mumbai. The petitioner cited discriminatory treatment compared to M/s. Bharuch Dahej Railway Co. Ltd., whose similar case was dismissed by the Tribunal on 25th March 2019. The court queried the Revenue's acceptance of the Delhi Commissioner's order and sought clarity on whether the Tribunal's decision would be challenged. The matter was adjourned to 1st August 2019, allowing the Revenue time to confirm its position on the Tribunal's ruling. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382585