https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382578 A writ petition for release of seized goods and conveyance under the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was not entertained because an appeal against the detention order had already been filed. The text indicates that the petitioner could seek release and any permissible interim protection in the pending appeal, rather than pursue parallel writ relief. The writ petition was therefore rejected. en-us Mon, 17 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Mar 2025 14:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382578 A writ petition for release of seized goods and conveyance under the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was not entertained because an appeal against the detention order had already been filed. The text indicates that the petitioner could seek release and any permissible interim protection in the pending appeal, rather than pursue parallel writ relief. The writ petition was therefore rejected. Case-Laws GST Mon, 17 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382578