<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (6) TMI 3 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18824</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the interpretation of Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, allowing for waiver of interest under rule 40(1) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The court emphasized the discretion of the Income-tax Officer to reduce or waive interest under Section 215(4) and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of rule 40(1), granting the benefit of doubt to the assessee. The issues regarding waiver of interest under rule 40(5) and the evaluation of rent-free accommodation perquisite were addressed, with a ruling against the assessee in the latter and in favor of the assessee for depreciation allowance based on written down value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:19:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (6) TMI 3 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18824</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the interpretation of Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, allowing for waiver of interest under rule 40(1) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The court emphasized the discretion of the Income-tax Officer to reduce or waive interest under Section 215(4) and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of rule 40(1), granting the benefit of doubt to the assessee. The issues regarding waiver of interest under rule 40(5) and the evaluation of rent-free accommodation perquisite were addressed, with a ruling against the assessee in the latter and in favor of the assessee for depreciation allowance based on written down value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>