<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 269 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382573</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no reason to entertain the special leave petitions and dismissed them. The order reflects refusal to exercise discretionary jurisdiction after condoning the delay, with no substantive adjudication on the underlying income tax dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 17:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 269 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382573</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no reason to entertain the special leave petitions and dismissed them. The order reflects refusal to exercise discretionary jurisdiction after condoning the delay, with no substantive adjudication on the underlying income tax dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>