<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 264 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382568</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition, finding no basis to grant special leave and declining further relief on the merits. However, it interfered with the ancillary costs order made by the High Court and set aside the costs of Rs. 1.5 lakhs, so that the costs direction would not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2019 07:58:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 264 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382568</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition, finding no basis to grant special leave and declining further relief on the merits. However, it interfered with the ancillary costs order made by the High Court and set aside the costs of Rs. 1.5 lakhs, so that the costs direction would not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>