<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Erred in Ruling on Appeal Without Representation for Previously Acquitted Accused; No Amicus Curiae Appointed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47754</link>
    <description>Dishonor of Cheque - When the accused was not represented, without appointing any counsel as amicus curiae to defend the accused, the High Court ought not to have decided the criminal appeal on merits; more so, when the appellant-accused had the benefit of the acquittal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2019 07:02:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2019 07:02:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Erred in Ruling on Appeal Without Representation for Previously Acquitted Accused; No Amicus Curiae Appointed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47754</link>
      <description>Dishonor of Cheque - When the accused was not represented, without appointing any counsel as amicus curiae to defend the accused, the High Court ought not to have decided the criminal appeal on merits; more so, when the appellant-accused had the benefit of the acquittal.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2019 07:02:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>