https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382546 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and remitted the matter back to the High Court for fresh consideration. The lack of representation for the appellant-accused during the appeal before the High Court was deemed crucial, with the Supreme Court emphasizing the need for fair opportunity and criticizing the High Court for not appointing an amicus curiae or ensuring proper representation. The failure to provide the appellant-accused with a chance to defend himself led to the Supreme Court's decision to overturn the High Court's conviction. en-us Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jul 2019 07:02:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382546 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and remitted the matter back to the High Court for fresh consideration. The lack of representation for the appellant-accused during the appeal before the High Court was deemed crucial, with the Supreme Court emphasizing the need for fair opportunity and criticizing the High Court for not appointing an amicus curiae or ensuring proper representation. The failure to provide the appellant-accused with a chance to defend himself led to the Supreme Court's decision to overturn the High Court's conviction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382546