<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1837 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281767</link>
    <description>The High Court criticized the Registry for registering defective appeals without objections. It emphasized the need for clear identification of specific appeal numbers and directed measures to prevent such errors. The appellant was granted leave to amend the appeals without re-verification, with the appeals scheduled for fresh admission post-amendment. The Court stressed the importance of accurately reflecting grievances in the memorandum of appeal to avoid registration issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2019 07:00:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1837 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281767</link>
      <description>The High Court criticized the Registry for registering defective appeals without objections. It emphasized the need for clear identification of specific appeal numbers and directed measures to prevent such errors. The appellant was granted leave to amend the appeals without re-verification, with the appeals scheduled for fresh admission post-amendment. The Court stressed the importance of accurately reflecting grievances in the memorandum of appeal to avoid registration issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>